The SC Magazine Newsteam Blog

Mac attack - is it here to stay?

Apple is no stranger to Microsoft-like patch cycles, and they’ve been coming with increasing frequency in recent months.

What the Cupertino, Calif.-based computing giant is not familiar with are viruses, especially the in-the-wild kind that are actively infecting its users.

The other day, I was talking to a Mac user about my job, what I write about etc. and his response was, “Oh I don’t have to worry about that stuff. I use a Mac.” I replied that that won’t always be the case, just you watch.

Sure enough, today came news that researchers had discovered the first-ever in-the-wild malware attack affecting the Mac operating system. It’s pretty harmless (the trojan changes DNS settings to redirect users to fake websites), but the event is hugely significant nonetheless.

Mac’s small market share - compared to Windows - has long shielded users for the ire of cybercrooks. But that protection is increasingly a thing of the past, especially as the platform sees more widespread adoption through mobile devices, such as the enormously popular iPhone and iPod.

Does this mean Mac users are going to have to run to their nearest anti-virus vendor to get help?

Probably not.

But does it mean they should stop thinking they are bullet proof?

Most definitely.

Just as an aside: I just IM’d my buddy Ryan, who has a Mac, to determine whether he runs AV on his machine. His response: “I don’t think so.”

Some Mac users are so clueless about security, they don’t even know if they have AV installed in the first place. It’s funny but I guess you can’t blame it.

In the meantime, if you’re not going to install AV, at least follow the common sense best practices of internet and email use. Don’t click on untrusted links and don’t visit untrusted websites.

Delicious Digg Technorati

2 Comments so far

  1. Nigel Mellish on November 1st, 2007

    “Mac users are so arrogant and clueless about security, they don’t even know if they have AV installed in the first place. I love it.”

    EXCUSE ME?

    How about this one:

    “SC Magazine authors are so stupid, they wouldn’t understand the concept of “risk” if you hit them over the head with it. I love it.”

    Or maybe:

    “Dan Kaplan is such an insipid moron that he doesn’t understand the concept of small sample size. I LOVE IT!”

    Or how about:

    “Dan Kaplan is such a bad journalist, he has to resort to really lousy sensationalism just to get eyeballs. I LOL!!!”

    Here’s one last one:

    “Dan Kaplan is so desperate for readers, he has to resort to name calling. NINJAS BEAT PIRATES!!!”

  2. Nigel Mellish on November 1st, 2007

    “It’s funny but I guess you can’t blame it.”

    Now that you’re too Nancy to stick by your original language, you might want to add another edit and explain what the “it” is you’re blaming.

Leave a reply

Home | News | Newsletters | Products | Blogs | Lists | Jobs | Events | Subscribe | Contact Us | About Us | Advertising | Editorial | Subscribe to our RSS feedsRSS

This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in any form without prior authorization.

Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of Haymarket Media's Privacy Policy and Terms & Conditions